| Back to Lube-Tips™ Back Issues. |
| Lube-Tips | Home
| Submit
Tip/Question Back Issues | Message Boards |
| Lubrication Tips
for Reliability Professionals |
July
30, 2003 Subscribers: 30,562 |
In This Issue:
Today's Tip: Paper Thermometer Reveals Temperature Spikes
Book Bits: Pressure Indicators Provide Early Warning
Q & A: Particle Counter Results Differ
In time-critical situations where real-time infrared thermography is impractical and thermocouple/recording equipment cannot be installed, consider temperature-sensitive tapes. These tapes are manufactured in a variety of sensing ranges and will clearly record the peak temperature that a machine area reached since the tape was first applied. A quick visual check is all it takes to read the "paper thermometer". (Submitted by Mark Smith, Technical Administrator, Analysts, Inc. Thanks Mark!)
Each tip published will earn the sender $50. Submit your tip
From "Total Contamination Control '98"
Differential pressure indicators are used to give warning of impending filter blockage. The pressure at which actuation occurs depends upon the setting of the bypass valve chosen and is usually set at about 70 percent of the bypass cracking pressure. This gives a safety margin so that element change can be effected at a convenient time before bypassing occurs.
More information about the book "Total Contamination Control '98"
"I have recently purchased an on-site portable particle counter allowing me to take immediate action on out-of-condition results. However, my instrument results seem to be lower than the results I receive from the laboratory. Is my new instrument at fault?"
Ownership of an on-site instrument is indeed a valuable addition to your program. However, do bear in mind the difference between taking a bottle sample and attaching your instrument directly online with the system.
Effectively, your instrument is giving you a direct insight to the system cleanliness without the corruption of potentially poor sampling procedures such as insufficient test port flushing, ambient contamination levels, and questionable bottle cleanliness.
My experience suggests that a difference of three ISO code values is the norm when comparing a laboratory result to an instrument, and may stretch to even wider differences. A difference of three codes is effectively a sample that is eight times dirtier - which when concentrated in a small sample bottle, is understandable.
However, proactive practitioners have successfully used laboratory bottle sampling to monitor their cleanliness levels, but I suggest you either make adjustments in your target cleanliness levels for the instrument, or set the targets based on bottle sampling, but monitor for sudden changes in the instrument cleanliness results that may not exceed the target caution/ critical levels.
Martin Williamson, Senior Technical Consultant, Noria UK Ltd.
Suggestions, Questions and Tip Submissions
Other correspondence:
Noria Corporation
1328 E. 43rd Court
Tulsa, OK 74105 USA
Phone: 918-749-1400
Fax: 918-746-0925
Noria publishes two magazines with complimentary subscriptions in the U.S., Europe and Canada.
Machinery Lubrication
Magazine and Practicing
Oil Analysis Magazine
Lube-Tips is also published in Spanish.
Request your subscription at informes@noria.com
Copyright © 2003, Noria Corporation. All rights reserved. If you would like to reproduce a Lube-Tip on your Web site, you must use the entire issue (without sponsorship messages and the training calendar). All links must work. For an example of how you can include Lube-Tips content on your Web site, go to: http://www.lube-tips.com/example.asp. The presence of advertising in Lube-Tips does not constitute an endorsement of the products or services in such ads. Further, because results will vary widely based on a number of factors, Noria Corporation cannot warrant the results, the accuracy or the completeness of any material published herein.
Lube-Tips is published by Noria Corporation. Oil Analysis and Lubrication Experts