Lube-Tips Newsletter

    January 12, 2005
Sent to 36,745 worldwide

1. Evaluating New Lubricants

2. Wear Debris Analysis for Condition Monitoring

3. What is an ICP?

4. Flow Rates for Off-line Filtration

Today's Tip: Evaluating New Lubricants

We have had several vendors tell us how their oil will save us money, and to prove it, they take temperature and amp readings on a piece of equipment before and after their oil is used. To isolate the effects of different oils, we decided to take these readings before and after changing out the oil in a piece of equipment with the same brand of oil.

We found that by flushing the gearbox and replacing the oil, the amp draw on 2-hp motors driving gearboxes will decrease by 1.7% and the temperature will decrease by as much as 10%. (Temperature is harder to pin down because while we can duplicate the machine parameters, we cannot stabilize the atmospheric conditions.) Using this information, we are able to more accurately evaluate the possible benefits of a new brand of oil. (Submitted by Bill Jacobyansky, Maintenance Manager, Guardian Industries. Thanks Bill.)

Each tip published will earn the sender $100. Submit your tip.


Book Bits: Wear Debris Analysis for Condition Monitoring


From "Wear Debris Analysis"

The condition of a machine cannot usually be determined from a single analysis of wear debris. Although an experienced user of the technique may form an opinion from the size of debris - large chunks undoubtedly conveying severe fatigue, for instance - a much clearer picture is conveyed only through trend analysis.

It would be extremely convenient if an absolute measure of wear debris were able to give a definitive go/no-go measure of condition. But this is only possible from experience built up from trend analysis on the same or similar machinery or systems. Many other types of condition monitoring also depend on this approach because of the wide variations in signal generation with condition. Trend analysis, however, is able to provide the required background for true machine condition determination.

More information about the book "Wear Debris Analysis"


Lube Trivia: What is an ICP?

Test your knowledge and prepare for ICML lubrication and oil analysis certification.

QUESTION: What is an ICP?

Get the answer.


Q & A: Flow Rates for Off-line Filtration


"Many of the available side stream (portable) filter systems have low flow rates (> 4 gallons per minute), and I am concerned that it might not be circulating enough oil to get ahead of the contaminant level. What is considered to be a good target flow rate for side-stream filtration?
"

There is no single answer for this question. Filter system selection must follow a thorough analysis of the system constraints and a clear definition of the task objectives. There are a handful of questions to ask about the targeted systems before selecting elements and hardware, including the following:

1. What is the relative cleanliness of the fluid in its initial state?

2. What is the new cleanliness target level?

3. How long can the portable filtration system run once it is put into operation?

4. What will the fluid viscosity be during filtration?

5. What is the sump volume?

6. What is the contaminant ingression rate?

The selection of filter elements and hardware can be a sliding scale based on the answers to these questions. A couple key principles to consider are:

1. If the flow is constant, as the operating viscosity increases, the element size should also increase.

2. As the flow increases element capture efficiency may decrease.

What does this mean in practical terms? Higher flow does not necessarily lead to improved cleanup rate unless the Beta (similar to capture efficiency) is not negatively effected. However, assuming Beta is constant, cleanup rate will be proportional to flow rate. For more on this check out this article from Machinery Lubrication.

Assume the following conditions: A) The facility is going to purchase a filter unit with a 5 GPM throughput; B) it will choose between a 5 inch spin-on, a 8.2-inch coreless element or the 16.9-inch coreless element; C) all the elements have the same beta rating (B10=100) regardless of flow rate; D) the facility has two 1,000-gallon sumps to filter; E) machine sump #1 has an operating viscosity of 180 cSt (circulating oil); and F) machine sump #2 has an operating viscosity of 55 cSt (hydraulic).

In this situation, any of the element options for sump #2 (hydraulic) may work, but the facility would be better off to select the 16.9-inch media for sump #1. The larger filter element will help maintain the 5 GPM rate (even positive-displacement pumps don't have 100% volumetric efficiciency) regardless of fluid temperature, which correlates to the amount of time the technician will have to leave the filter in place to reach the cleanliness target. Additionally, large filters translate to lower element flow density which typically translates to better filter economy (cost to take out a gram of dirt) and more stable capture efficiency throughout the filter's life.

The point of this exercise is to show that there are many factors that should be considered prior to making this decision. It is not a complicated decision if the objectives and the constraints are clearly defined. Start by evaluating the constraints and setting the cleanliness objectives. From there, it is a simple engineering exercise that can be rooted in known criteria. Read more about this topic.

Mike Johnson, Noria Corporation

Submit a question | Discuss on Message Boards

Resources

 

Training Calendar

JANUARY 2005

Effective Contamination Control
25-26 Birmingham, AL

Machinery Lubrication I
20-21 Gdansk, Poland

Oil Analysis I
25-26 Monterrey, Mexico

Oil Analysis II
27-28 Monterrey, Mexico

 

FEBRUARY 2005

Machinery Lubrication I
14-15 Gaborone, Botswana
22-24 Point Lisas, Trinidad

Machinery Lubrication II
16-17 Gaborone, Botswana
24-25 Gdansk, Poland

Oil Analysis I
8-10 San Diego, CA
15-16 Sunninghill, Johannesburg, South Africa
23-24 San Juan, Puerto Rico
22-24 Daegu, Korea
23-24 Valencia, Venezuela

Oil Analysis II
17-18 Sunninghill, Johannesburg, South Africa

Oil Analysis – The Complete Course
8-10 Gdansk, Poland

Effective Mobile Equipment Lubrication
22-24 Reno, NV

Técnicas de Lubricación
17 Cartagena, Colombia
22 San Juan, Puerto Rico
22 Valencia, Venezuela
24 Santa Cruz, Bolivia

Análisis de Aceite para Equipo Móvil
15-16 Cartagena, Columbia


Lube-Tips is published weekly by:
Noria Corporation, 1328 E. 43rd Court, Tulsa, OK 74105 USA. (918) 749-1400

Because results will vary widely based on a number of factors, Noria Corporation cannot warrant the results of any material within this e-mail.

© 1998-2005 Noria Corporation

»Receive your own subscription to Lube-Tips

Other Resources:
»Lube-Tips Archives
»Machinery Lubrication Magazine
»Practicing Oil Analysis Magazine
»Bookstore
»Buyers Guide
»Dictionary