No Images? Click Here.

Lube-Tips Newsletter

    October 11, 2006
Sent to 46,511 subscribers

1. How Particles Create Particles

2. Extend Time Between Outages by 50%?

3. Where Does Pitting Occur?

4. Testing Water Separability

Today's Tip: How Particles Create Particles

Abrasive wear can cause a chain reaction in lubricated machinery. The typical chain reaction is:

  • Abrasive particles become work hardened.

  • Work hardened particles produce more particles.

  • New particles become work hardened.

  • Chain reaction continues until the particles are removed by filtration or the machine fails.

We send $100 for each tip published.
Submit your tip
.


Effective Contamination Control for Lubrication Professionals

Join Noria's Jim Fitch for Effective Contamination Control training in Raleigh, NC on November 14-16 and learn how to extend machine and lubricant life by up to 10 times.


Book Bits: Extend Time Between Outages by 50%?

From the "Practical Plant Failure Analysis":

As every reliability professional has seen, another area where the value of failure analysis commonly isn't utilized involves the practice of routinely scheduled outages. Should maintenance be scheduled based on the position of the sun or the moon and end up with monthly or annual outages? What is the real difference between a scheduled outage and a breakdown? The need for maintenance has to be recognized but in many cases the time between these "scheduled failures" can be greatly lengthened by analysis of the need for the various phases of the outage. We have never seen a situation where, after a competent and detailed analysis, the time between outages hasn't been increased by at least 50%.

More information about "Practical Plant Failure Analysis "


Lube Trivia: Where Does Pitting Occur?

Test your knowledge and prepare for ICML lubrication and oil analysis certification.

Question: Where on a gear tooth might you see pitting?

Get the answer.


Q & A: Testing Water Separability

"We recently had an oil sample of turbine oil fail the water separability test (ASTM 1401) at two labs and pass at another lab. The results from the two labs where the sample failed are 5-25-50 and 3-24-53. The results for the sample that passed was 40-40-0. What could cause the results to be so different?"

Based on these results, it is likely that the lab that came back with 40-40-0 didn't actually run the test. I would tend to believe the first two labs.

This is generally pretty easy to confirm. Just mix equal parts of the oil with water in a cocktail blender. Pour the mixture in a graduated cylinder. If the oil and water separate completely and quickly (in less than 30 minutes), then it's probably a 40-40-0.

Jim Fitch, Noria Corporation

Submit a question | Discuss on Message Boards


Resources


An Imperative Link in the Reliability Chain
Prohibit contaminant entry and improve your bottom line.
www.des-case.com
615-672-8800

 

Molykote
Tap into the latest
industry expertise. Non-commercial, practical information.

Sign up now for Molykote's Smart Lubrication™ Series.
www.molykote.com

 


The TestMate Contamination Monitor (TCM)
continuously measures solid contamination inline and provides instantaneous readings as an ISO code within in a 4" diameter case.
E-mail. 800-722-481

 


Need performance and reliability?
Get Dow's PAG-based synthetic lubricants. Multiple formulations and viscosities for your specific application needs.

 


FLIR Systems' ThermaCAM® SC640
The world's first hand-held 640x480 resolution camera for scientific/R&D applications.

Noria Training Calendar

OCTOBER 2006

Effective Contamination Control
25-27 Midrand, South Africa

Machinery Lubrication I
18-20 Tokyo, Japan
24-25 Monterrey, México
25-27 São Paulo, Brazil
Oct 31–Nov 2 Sydney, Australia

Machinery Lubrication II
12-13 Antofagasta, Chile
17-19 Perth, Australia
26-27 Monterrey, México

Oil Analysis I
23-24 Bilbao, Spain
23-25 Tokyo, Japan

Oil Analysis II
17-19 Daegu, Korea
17-19 Oslo, Norway
24-26 Sydney, Australia
25-26 Bilbao, Spain
25-26 Utrecht, Netherlands

NOVEMBER 2006

Machinery Lubrication I
7-9 Branson, MO
20-22 Chester, United Kingdom
20-21 Madrid, Spain

Machinery Lubrication II
28-30 Memphis, TN
7-8 Gdansk, Poland
14-16 Daegu, Korea
15-16 Buenos Aires, Argentina
20-24 Port Harcourt, Nigeria
22-23 Madrid, Spain
22-24 São Paulo, Brazil

Oil Analysis I
28-30 Memphis, TN
6-7 Santiago, Chile
20-21 Lima, Peru
27-29 Chester, United Kingdom

Oil Analysis II
8-9 Santiago, Chile
22-23 Lima, Peru
22-24 México, D.F., México

Planning and Scheduling
28-29, Memphis, TN

Reliability Focused Spare Parts Management
30-31, Memphis, TN

Effective Plant Reliability Management
6-7 Chester, United Kingdom
20 Namur, Belgium
29-30 San Fernando, Trinidad

Análisis de Aceite para Equipo Móvil
14-15 México, D.F., México

Best Practices for Machinery Lubrication
22-24 Bangkok, Thailand

Effective Contamination Control
14-16 Raleigh, NC
7-8 Amersfoort, Netherlands
7-9 Maracaibo, Venezuela

Effective Mobile Equipment Lubrication
14-15 Amersfoort, Netherlands

Reliability World Europe 2006
21-22 Namur, Belgium

Técnicas de Lubricación
16 México, D.F., México


Lube-Tips is published bi-weekly by:
Noria Corporation, 1328 E. 43rd Ct., Tulsa, OK 74105 USA.
(918) 749-1400

Because results will vary widely based on a number of factors, Noria Corporation cannot warrant the results of any information within this e-mail.

© 2006 Noria Corporation

»Receive your own subscription to Lube-Tips

Other Resources:
»Lube-Tips Archives
»Machinery Lubrication Magazine
»Practicing Oil Analysis Magazine
»Reliable Plant Magazine

»Bookstore
»Buyers Guide
»Dictionary